Content of the chapter:
INTRODUCTION
1. COUNTRY PROGRAMME OVERVIEW
2. COUNTRY SITUATION ANALYSIS
3.STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS
3.1.Five-Year Vision
3.2.Two-Year Objectives and Key Results Areas
3.3.Community Level Programming Priorities
3.4.Strategies for Expanding Impact
3.5. Programme Sustainability and Resource Mobilization
4.IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Attachments
1.List of Participants and Consultants
2. Glossary of Terms
3. Potentially Eligible GEF/SGP Projects/Activities By Operational Programme
4. Ecosystems in Kyrgyzstan
5. Protected Areas
6. Gains of Hunting Animals (heads)
7. Environmental Legislation in the Kyrgyz Republic
8. Projects Supported by Foreign and International Organizations and Programmes
9. List of Important Ecosystems in the Kyrgyz Republic Containing "Hot Spots" of Unique Species of Flora and Fauna Endangered by Excessive Anthropogenic Impact
10. Problematic Land and Water Geo-systems
11 Administrative Map of Kyrgyzstan
12. Physiographical Regions Map
13. Map of Permanent Population Density
14. Map of Forests
15.Land Use Map
16. Map of Waste Storage Sites

3.STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS
3.4.Strategies for Expanding Impact

The programme's impact in Kyrgyzstan will be expanded in four primary ways (which are by no means exclusive): mainstreaming, information dissemination, scaling-up, and developing a critical mass of projects.

Mainstreaming
br> Mainstreaming of GEF/SGP programmes within the United Nations, Government, and major donor programmes in the environmental sector is a major strategic target of the GEF/SGP, one that can be expected to result in broader impact. By mainstreaming, the GEF/SGP will ensure:
· Replication of the programme's participatory approach, operational programmes, methodologies, and resulting global benefits;
· Prioritization of the programme's focal areas within other programmes;
· Input into the policy formulation process through linkages provided by other frameworks;
· Adoption of the programme's best practices.

Mainstreaming opportunities exist with:·
U.N. programmes, especially the Central Asia Regional Environmental Action Plan (REAP), the Special Programmes for the Economies of Central Asia SPECA (component on the Rational and Efficient Use of Energy and Water Resources of Central Asia), Aral Sea Basin Capacity Development Project, the Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), and the Local Initiative Facility for Urban Environment (LIFE);
· Government programmes and various other programmes in wildlife management, forestry, hunting, fishing, and land reform;
· Other donor programmes such as the Swiss Intercooperation forest support programme, the Swiss Central Asia Mountain Programme (CAMP), the GTZ-supported project "Biosphere territory of Issyk-Kul", and TACIS's programme "Water Resource Management and Agriculture Production";
· GEF medium-size projects "Biodiversity Conservation of Western Tien Shan" and "Enabling the Kyrgyz Republic to prepare its First National Communication in Response to its Commitments to the UNFCCC".

.Information Dissemination


Publicly advocating the programme's methodologies, projects, and best practices is a priority activity that will enhance impact. Modes through which information dissemination will be carried out include:
· Existing UNDP Country Office and PIU networks
· Media
· Exhibitions
· Newsletter
· Partnership-based programmes and projects
· Use of existing projects as intervention points for NGOs and CBOs

Scaling-up


Scaling-up activities will be deliberately undertaken and promoted especially in those strategically identified directions where demonstration projects are planned. Existing successful initiatives and programmes will also be assisted with scaling-up so that they have broader impacts and broader frameworks for coinciding with GEF/SGP projects.

Developing a Critical Mass of Projects

Developing a Critical Mass of Projects
A central consideration of the GEF/SGP Strategic Framework is the need to develop a critical mass of projects and activities that enhances impact and replication of the programme. This consideration will be a guiding factor in the selection of projects and activities. In assessing proposals, the NSC will regard the following characteristics as critical for achieving the desired impact. These considerations are in no way superior to the guiding GEF criteria and strategic considerations; they are supplemental or listed here for emphasis:
· Capacity for replication
· Capacity for scaling-up
· Level of anticipated impact
· Anticipated best practices
· Level of broader and participatory community involvement
· Clear cut, globally focused goals and objectives easily understood by the communities involved
· Thematic distribution
up

3.5. Programme Sustainability and Resource Mobilization

The GEF/SGP Participatory Approach
Participation, flexibility, and transparency are cornerstones of the GEF/SGP approach. The programme encourages and supports participation of communities, local people, NGOs, CBOs, and other stakeholders in key aspects of implementation:
· formulation of country programme strategies;
· development, presentation, and execution of project concept papers and proposals;
· building partnerships to broaden the scope of the programme and to communicate and replicate successful GEF/SGP initiatives;
· raising public awareness of global environmental issues and changing public attitudes and practices;
· influencing government environmental policies and programmes; and
· mobilizing in-kind and monetary resources to support project and programme sustainability.

In order to ensure the programme's sustainability, it is important that the community-based projects achieve sustainability. Community-level projects will be sustainable if they provide direct benefits to those implementing them.

In Kyrgyzstan, local NGOs and CBOs will be preferred to national ("capital") ones in the awarding of grants for local projects. For logistical reasons, local NGOs can often achieve the same project results (as national NGOs can) at lower costs. Funding for a local project proposed by a national NGO alone will be discouraged. If a national NGO proposes a local project, the NGO will be directed to cooperate with local NGOs, CBOs, or the local community and to revise its proposal to include joint management with them or to foresee community participation in all steps of the project. These procedures will be promoted because they provide the least expensive and easiest way to build the capacity of inexperienced local NGOs and CBOs.

Cooperation among NGOs in projects will be promoted where possible. For this reason:
· Cooperation between two or more NGOs in performing a project will be considered a positive point in the evaluation of the project;
· National NGOs will be encouraged to cooperate with local ones, and vice-versa;
· Potential cooperation between an NGO active in the GEF focal areas and another that is not active in these areas but whose target groups (youth, women, etc.) might be helpful for the successful completion of the project will be considered a positive point in the evaluation of the project.

The National Coordinator and the National Steering Committee (NSC) will ensure that participatory and transparent procedures are established and practiced at the country level in accordance with this framework and the GEF/SGP Operational Guidelines.

Resource Mobilization
The GEF/SGP will need to mobilize other resources and organizations (NGOs, private sector, international donors, government agencies, UNDP programmes) to provide co-financing, technical assistance, capacity building, gender training, income-generation components, and any other non-GEF element that may be necessary for a project's success. In order to secure co-financing and technical assistance for projects to complement or augment GEF/SGP grants whenever possible, the GEF/SGP country programme should develop linkages through activities such as:

· Supporting the establishment of a self-regulating revolving fund for income-generating projects;
· Encouraging grant recipients to contribute a certain percentage of the overall project budget to the revolving fund;
· Encouraging community contributions to the revolving fund;
· Seeking co-financing arrangements with other donors such as international NGOs, bilateral funding agencies, multilateral agencies, and the private sector (individuals and private companies) to sustain GEF/SGP projects;
· Building corporate (private) sector partnerships (e.g., hotels, travel agencies, banks) and organizing dialogue sessions with them.

The participation of partner donors and local and national stakeholders in project implementation enhances sustainability of the GEF/SGP intervention. It is hoped that NGO or donor partners would also look to GEF/SGP for assistance in focusing on global environmental concerns when designing their own projects.

Capacity Building and Technical Assistance
GEF/SGP gives priority to projects that:
· Ensure community participation in the drafting, implementing, monitoring, and evaluation process;
· Include cooperation with local organizations;
· Address sustainable livelihoods of local communities;
· Rely on local technical and scientific resources;
· Foresee capacity building.

The GEF/SGP National Coordinator, NSC members, relevant NGOs, and other stakeholders will participate in a GEF country network.

The GEF/SGP in Kyrgyzstan will encourage NGOs/CBOs to visit successful projects. NSC members will also participate in exchanges and visits to the sites of GEF/SGP-funded projects. These exchanges will facilitate the training process and the dissemination of information on best practices and lessons learned.
up


2003© ГЭФ Программа малых грантов
e-mail: geflife@elcat.kg ,
тел: 62-57-04, сайт:http://gef.undp.kg

Разработка и поддержка: knir@netmail.kg
Условия для лучшего просмотра: Область экрана - от 600*800;
Internet Explorer (от 4.0) & Netscape Navigator( от 4.7)
Версия на русском